Gender equality would ensure that society is equal and fair. So much is done, but the common myths about equality keep lingering and limit the focus on physical strength rather than broader opportunities for representation. True gender equality cannot be about homogenizing men and women; it is more about recognizing and valuing their unique strengths and contributions. Men and women have different skills, and most of the time, men have better skills in areas requiring strength. Women provide unmatched stamina, compassion, and solution-finding qualities. The cry of women about gender equality does not, therefore amount to fighting men on matters of brawn but having them levelled up equally with all the representation rights. As Malala Yousafzai has said, "I raise up my voice—not so I can shout, but so that those without a voice can be heard." Gender equality is making systems value different perspectives in society, hence enriching society holistically.
India has had some strong voices in the cause of gender equality with a remarkable passion and insight. Sudha Murthy, a doyenne in philanthropy and literature, is often quoted as saying how the emancipation of women could uplift the whole family and the community. Murthy believes that education and access to equal opportunities can level systemic imbalances. Yet such strides have not ended it all. Social norms, biases, and system inequalities are more than likely to stall such progress. To overcome these, society must break all stereotypes and assure that resources would be available at equal instances. Real life examples are pointing out the ways in which women suffer from societal norms prevailing since ages. The case in point is several cases that have been witnessed in corporate India where women have been deprived of promotions or even jobs because they would require maternity leave. They indeed weaken not only professional aspiration but also the sustainability of systemic inequality.
However, this balance of gender equality will only be fulfilled when the inequalities met by men are also redressed. A case like Atul Subash can be cited as a shining example where the misuse of gender-biased laws has turned a man's life upside down. The first criticism point is that men under Section 498A are presumed guilty. In cases where there is no evidence they suffer from social stigma and professional setbacks. Though the laws were framed to redress the old wrongs against women by acts of sati, female feticide, or such other brutal practices and even now misinterpretation of these laws often yields unfair results against males as well. Gender equity should be on both sides; no body must be discriminated either on the basis of sex or gender. There should be a review on these laws and an equal framework ought to be brought forth with respect to the rights of all persons without any biased gender. This is important, but more important is the fact that we have to acknowledge there are shifts in the dynamics of society and with the challenges for men and women. We need to be able to build a future where equality is no longer an aspiration but reality for all through the promotion of equal opportunities, representation, and respect.
By Ashwani S Nair BCA (2023-2027)